Category: MLB

MLB Power Ratings

As of 9/17/2022

Here are the Lazy Man Sports current power ratings for Major League Baseball. This is intended to be a snapshot in time look at each team’s relative power. The number to the right indicates how many runs, on average, each team would net against a perfectly average team on a neutral field.

Rk	Team		Pow
1	LA Dodgers	1.34
2	NY Mets		1.02
3	Houston		0.89
4	Atlanta		0.88
5	NY Yankees	0.81
6	Toronto		0.69
7	San Diego	0.55
8	St. Louis	0.51
9	Tampa Bay	0.5
10	Milwaukee	0.49
11	Philadelphia	0.38
12	Seattle		0.37
13	Chi. White Sox	0.19
14	Cleveland	0.11
15	San Francisco	0.02
16	Boston		-0.06
17	Minnesota	-0.09
18	LA Angels	-0.17
19	Baltimore	-0.27
20	Miami		-0.28
21	Texas		-0.39
22	Arizona		-0.42
23	Chi. Cubs	-0.61
24	Colorado	-0.75
24	Kansas City	-0.75
26	Cincinnati	-0.91
27	Detroit		-1.04
27	Pittsburgh	-1.04
29	Oakland		-1.15
30	Washington	-1.19

MLB Power Ratings

As of 9/17/2022

Here are the Lazy Man Sports current power ratings for Major League Baseball. This is intended to be a snapshot in time look at each team’s relative power. The number to the right indicates how many runs, on average, each team would net against a perfectly average team on a neutral field.

Rk  Team             Pow
1.  LA Dodgers       1.32
2.  Atlanta          0.97
3.  NY Mets          0.91
4.  Houston          0.80
5.  NY Yankees       0.75
6.  Toronto          0.70
7.  San Diego        0.63
8.  Tampa Bay        0.481
9.  St. Louis        0.476
10. Milwaukee        0.44
11. Philadelphia     0.37
12. Seattle          0.36
13. Chi. White Sox   0.15
14. San Francisco    0.13
15. Minnesota        0.07
16. Cleveland        0.05
17. Boston          -0.05
18. LA Angels       -0.29
19. Miami           -0.33
20. Baltimore       -0.38
21. Arizona         -0.42
22. Texas           -0.43
23. Chi. Cubs       -0.58
24. Kansas City     -0.80
25. Colorado        -0.82
26. Detroit         -1.00
27. Cincinnati      -1.03
28. Oakland         -1.07
29. Washington      -1.13
30. Pittsburgh      -1.14

© 2024

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑